Zimbabwe – A Tragic Reminder

I long ago gave up being frustrated and bitter with the ineptitude of both British and American politicians, who thought they had the knowledge and wisdom to define for Zimbabwe (Rhodesia as it was then) how it should organise itself.

This article, though, is a stark reminder, if any were needed, just how badly the British in particular, but ably assisted by the Americans, managed to totally screw up a country that was one of the most productive in Africa.

And that was at a time when Africa as a whole was a lot more productive than it is today.

A few facts:

Between 1966 and 1980 (the year Mugabe came to power thanks to a corrupt election which the British, through Nicholas Soames, turned a blind eye to) Rhodesia boasted:

  • Sub 5% inflation
  • Sub 5% interest rates
  • A positive current account balance
  • The highest spending per capita in Africa (including South Africa) on education
  • The highest spending per capita in Africa (including South Africa) on health
  • A thriving agricultural economy that exported food to surrounding African countries
  • A thriving textiles industry that exported clothing and clothing materials.
  • A thriving mining industry
  • A top class university in which 60% of the students were black African
  • A highly effective military and police force of which the membership (of both) was 60% black African. (Rhodesian counter terrorist forces were acknowledged as among the best in the world).
  • Many hugely successful black African owned businesses.
  • No legally based racial segregation. (The right to vote was open to people of all races provided they paid more than a prescribed amount of tax annually).
  • From 1978 onwards, a multi-racial government, headed by Abel Muzorewa.

This was a country that was a net contributor to the world economy, despite years of mandatory international trade sanctions imposed by the United Nations at the request of Britain after Rhodesia declared UDI in 1965.

And this is the country that the conservative government of Margaret Thatcher forced Mugabe onto, at the Lancaster House conference in November 1979 and the subsequent election in 1980.

An election that was universally acknowledged as being corrupt, but which the then interim British governor, Nicholas Soames, and the British government, turned a blind eye to.

All because they wanted a tick on the Foreign Policy bed post, so they could get a problem off their hands.

I often wonder whether Margaret Thatcher and Peter Carrington (British Foreign Secretary at the time) feel any guilt about the results of their actions back then.

But I doubt it.

Just in case you didn’t get it, Mrs Thatcher and Lord Carrington: Zimbabwe-Rhodesia, as it was called by then, already had a multi-racial government and a multi-racial society that was at peace with itself.

It was only your insistence on pandering to the so-called Patriotic Front and turning a blind eye to a clearly corrupt election that resulted in the mess we have today.

And, by the way, re the Patriotic Front…

It was, if you recall, an alliance between the two major tribal groupings in Rhodesia at the time – the Mashonas and the Matabeles.

Lifelong enemies.

As soon as Mugabe (a Mashona) was in power he set about sidelining Nkomo (a Matabele and his so-called Patriotic Front partner) and massacring 10′s of thousands of Matabele in Matabeleland, South Western Rhodesia.

Saddam Hussein would have been proud.

So pat yourselves on the back. Your actions and decisions resulted in the comprehensive destruction of the bread basket of Africa.

Maybe I am still bitter and frustrated after all…

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

The Great Simpleton August 18, 2009 at 2:50 AM

What I’ve always wanted to know is:

If 2nd, 3rd and subsequent immigrants to Britain are British (which they are), how come 2nd, 3rd and subsequent generations of whites in Africa, aren’t Africans?

Reply

peters April 15, 2010 at 6:50 PM

Yes – When I went to Rhodesia most of my fellowmen were ex- war time service men and women like myself. Many were working small plots of land given to them by the Old British Government for their services – many servicemen having been disabled.
However, coming back home without our funds and assets -as those were given by the British Government for Mugabe’s welfare
However,most of us on arriving back in UK found few relatives alive on our return and therefore it has been a real hardship for so many. Now when we need benefits – the youth of today have no idea how hard it is for us to complain and also claim as most of us we were not brought up to live off benefits and – saying I want.
I feel that all ex-service people seconded into wartime services should have better pensions.
Ex Service wartime

Reply

Martin April 16, 2010 at 6:57 AM

Hi Peters,

Although it was a long time ago that I left, I do totally empathise with the difficulty of accepting state benefits and handouts.

Luckily I managed to get by without having to do that, but yes – it’s tough.

What’s happened in Africa (not just Zimbabwe) over the past 40 years has been nothing more than a tragic waste. It’s a continent that’s so naturally wealthy but which is so poor, mostly because of politics.

Thanks for stopping by!

Cheers,

Martin.

Reply

Martin August 18, 2009 at 7:03 AM

I honestly don’t know – maybe it’s because you can get a British passport, once you qualify, but not an African passport..!?

Who knows…

Cheers,

Martin.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: